🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he endured losing against Grimsby. Survive an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and then discard them for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.