🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a latest court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would reexamine the case concerning the president’s authority with an larger group of eleven justices. The court also overturned a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to send national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to months of protests.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that local officers have command of the circumstances.

In defiance of characterizations of the city as a conflict zone, locals have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an protest bicycle event against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to circumvent the first order by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to ensure government responsibility. The founding document limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the armed forces into American urban areas without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, principles, and autonomy as this case progresses and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”